Recent Findings

Nuremberg Code
Nuremberg Violation Mandatory Covid Shots Are Nuremberg Violation Level Racketeering (Nov 7 2022)

The Nuremberg Code

  • Experimental drugs, trials, cannot be mandated, because that violates fundamental human rights, and the Nuremberg Code [49].

  • In order to participate in an experimental trial, the subject needs to give voluntary consent, not under coercion.

  • Coercing or forcing a person to participate in a medical experiment goes against the first principle of the Nuremberg Code, formulated in 1947 in response to the Nazi doctors performing medical experiments on people during WWII: “Voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential”. [49]

  • The Fifth principle of the Nuremberg Code states that “No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects”. [36, 49, 105] (NOTE: Dr Zelenko, cited in [105], exposed that the FDA knew about the lethal side-effects of the mRNA vaccines two months before they came out)

  • The Nuremberg code served a blueprint for today's principles that ensure the rights of subjects in medical research. Because of its link with the horrors of World War II and the use of prisoners in Nazi concentration camps for medical experimentation, debate continues today about the authority of the Code, its applicability to modern medical research. The Doctors’ Trial began in Dec 9, 1946. 16 of the 23 defendants were found guilty; 7 of them were sentenced to death by hanging, 5 to life imprisonment, 2 to imprisonment for 25 years. [105]

  • Watch a documentary on the last surviving prosecutor of the Nuremberg trials. [252]

The Ten Principles of the Nuremberg Code

  • The 10 principles of the Nuremberg code: [49, 240]

    1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.

    2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.

    3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.

    4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.

    5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.

    6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.

    7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.

    8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.

    9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.

    10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill, and careful judgement required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.