Dr Zelenko talks to Australian Politicians

• Dr Vladimir Zelenko, as part of a panel of COVID Experts, speaks to Australian Politicians: [254, from11m00s]

  • My comments are directed to the lay public and to the politicians, so my terminology will be less technical, but I think I want to communicate to as many people as possible.
  • First, don’t believe a word I’m saying. It’s a big mistake to blindly follow anyone. You should listen, take notes, I provide all the references for the basis of my opinions, then you use your own diligence, use critical thinking and analytical thought, and come up with your own opinions. This is very important, I’m just one person.
  • If someone catches COVID, our government is still recommending the delay in treatment, and according to the NIH, only if the patient is in the hospital hypoxic, with no oxygen, should treatment be initiated. That’s the concept.
  • Now, I want to talk more about ”the forest for the trees”, globally, to understand what’s going on.
  • I think trust is very important. There’re conflicting opinions, so it’s important to know who to trust, and who not to trust.
  • I’m going to say some controversial things. You don’t have to believe me. I have the evidence for it. You can review it; and even then, you don’t have to agree, but, at least, allow me to express my viewpoint.
  • This is not a natural event: that this was a natural virus, a bad corona virus, which was manipulated over 20 years by very clever scientists, first of all, to make it infectious to human beings, and that was work from Dr Ralph Baric, at Chapel Hill, North Carolina; he published it, he got a patent for that.
  • In 2015, in China, Dr Ralph Baric, and Dr Shi Zhengli, funded by the NIH, published a paper, and they figured out how to augment the lethality of this type of virus.
  • If we understand that this actual virus, when we call “gain-of-function research”, is clever wording, just taking an animal virus, and giving it a new function, which is to infect human beings, becomes a weapon of mass murder, and mass destruction.
  • Now we have to ask ourselves, “wait Dr Ralph Baric, is he the one that in 2010 wrote a paper that published the efficacy of Zinc and Zinc ionophores against Corona viruses? Is he the one that was involved in every single step in making this weapon of mass destruction?”
  • So let’s change the concept: this is a weapon, a bomb. And there is also an antidote to the bomb, made by the same people.
  • Also, it turns out that Dr Baric was part of Gilead’s team that developed Remdesivir. [259] Oh, interesting … that raises a lot of questions, I think, that need to be asked.
  • I personally don’t trust an organisation like the NIH, which tells you, if you go to their web site, “don’t treat people until they have lung damage”.
  • I personally don’t trust an organisation like the FDA, who revoked the emergency use authorisation (EUA) for Hydroxicloroquine (HCQ). And you look at that document, and you see that the basis for the revocation, (and everything is time-stamped) is a paper published by Lancet, that was a meta-analysis of maybe 6000 patients, stating that HCQ kills people. The problem with that paper was that it was based on fraudulent data. And that paper was retracted, for fraud. And a few weeks after its retraction, the FDA revokes the EUA for HCQ, and uses as the basis for the revocation that retracted paper, which was retracted for fraud. Can someone explain to me what that means?
  • And now, I have another question: the people that actually invented the cure for this, I give credit to Ralph Baric. I stumbled across that, out of clinical necessity. And I started using it with my patients, and it helped, and I got the attention of the president of the USA. He made it very public. And then I saw that the same governing bodies started vilifying and suppressing knowledge about HCQ, saying it’s going to kill you, that you’re going to drop dead by some arrhythmia. It didn’t make sense to me because HCQ was around for 65 years, was FDA approved for rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, malaria, and malaria prophylaxis. It’s given to pregnant women, to nursing mothers, it’s given to children, some people live on it their whole entire lives, for chronic diseases like rheumatoid arthritis.
  • And I was not sure about the electrical issue, so I spoke to a few electro-physiologists. There’s only 3000 in America, and they have their own website group. So I asked one of my friends to ask them a question: “has anyone ever seen a negative outcome using HCQ, with Erythromycin also?”, and the answer was, in the entire nation, “zero”. But the caveat, outside of the Intensive Care Unit. Meaning, they have never seen.
  • So I said to myself, I have to keep my patients alive, and I’m seeing such nefarious and malevolent messaging from the government. That was my “red pill”, that opened my mind to try to analyse what really was going on.
  • My point being that we should not trust the governing bodies that made this weapon, made the antidote, suppressed the antidote, and when other doctors stumbled across it, vilified and marginalised, and scared the hell out of the public, and threatened doctors for using it.
  • Craig Kelly is on this call. He’ll tell you that in Australia doctors who used HCQ, and now Ivermectin (IVM), some of them, can go to jail.
  • And then, when IVM became obvious that it worked as well, the same process of vilification happened.
  • So, it seems, that there is another agenda here. What is that agenda? It’s called “mass psychosis”. Everyone who studied psychological warfare knows that if you create prolonged fear and anxiety, and you isolate people from people they love, most people don’t know. And when they are in that sate of mind, they become very gullable and very easy to manipulate.
  • Anything that has potential to reduce the fear in the world, to help people reintegrate into society, to help people normalise their lives again, give them hope, was immediately vilified.
  • When I was using HCQ in early treatment, that was suppressed.
  • Now, you have to ask yourself a question: Why, who’s benefitting from global psychosis? I have evidence for this, and provided a link.
  • But in 2016, Klaus Schwab said in an interview, that 7 billion people will be tagged with a digital identifier, within 10 years, by 2026.
  • I was saying to myself, “what’s 2026? what’s going on there?” It turned out that’s the predicted date, it was 2028, now 2027, that there was going to be a huge economic disaster. Where, in the USA, the medicare and social security systems begin to go bankrupt. It’s going to destabilise world’s economies. And the financial structure in the world is going to change.
  • That began my thinking along those lines, and I realised this has nothing to do with medicine.
  • Let’s talk about the vaccines. If you do a risk-benefit analysis, it is based on three factors:
    • It is based on medical necessity: do we need them? If you come into my office with a runny nose, I don’t have to amputate your hand; even though I know how to do that, it’s not medically necessary. So that’s the concept of medical necessity; just because I know how to do something, it doesn’t mean I have to do it, unless it’s for the benefit of the patient, and the risk is worth it.

  • So let’s look at medical necessity when it comes to COVID-19:

    • According to the CDC, 99.998% of children recover from COVID with no intervention. That’s same as influenza virus.
    • According to Dr Michael Yeadon, and he has the statistical analysis to prove it, the vaccines are 100 times more lethal to children, than COVID. In other words, the COVID vaccines are 100 times more deadly to children, according to his calculations (I actually think it’s a little more), than the actual virus.
    • So I don’t think there’s a medical necessity to inoculate children with something of such a risk, potentially.

  • Dr Mallone mentioned if they have natural immunity. There are hundreds of papers showing that natural, God-given, immunity is much more robust, much more diverse, much more effective than a vaccine. So why would I inject someone to produce dangerous anti-bodies, if they have superior anti-bodies?

  • The high-risk group, with a real risk-benefit analysis, depends on which country you live in, carries between a 5 – 7.5% mortality rate. That’s unacceptable. We have to mitigate that risk. I’m not anti-vax, just not stupid. I analyse each therapeutic on its own merits, and I make a risk-benefit analysis to see if it is worth it.
  • In the high risk group, maybe the vaccines are indicated, even if there’s a current risk. However, there is a little reality: we, with the right clinical approach, can reduce the mortality by 85% of COVID-19 in the high risk population. Proven. So we can reduce the 7.5% mortality rate by 0..5%.
  • That’s a more appropriate analysis, considering that the vaccines are therapeutic and pre-hospital, out-patient, anti-viral, therapeutic approach, let’s see which one is better.
  • I’m telling you we can reduce mortality to less than 0.5%, depending on which country you are, in high-risk population.
  • What is the mortality from the vaccines? Again, I provide that information, but we know these vaccines are a big problem: In October of 2020, the FDA had an internal presentation to its researchers and scientists and in slide 16 of that presentation they list all the side-effects (neurologic, haematologic, heart attacks, strokes, terrible neurologic side-effects),
    and if you look at the VAERS or international databases that report side-effects, it’s 100% correlation with what the FDA said to its scientists two months prior to the rollout.
  • 
  • That’s important. Oct 2020 was two months BEFORE the vaccines were deployed. So two months prior, the FDA educates its own researchers about the side-effects, then the vaccines are deployed, a few months later, we have enough data from VAERS and other sources, with 100% correlation of what was predicted earlier to what people are experiencing. There’s a term for that: it’s called “pre-meditated first-degree murder”, “genocide”, and “crimes against humanity”.
  • So we need to understand that the whole point of the global fear is to motivate a change, called it “the Great Reset”, or “the New World Order”, from a perspective of totalitarian control. Because this has been known and predicted 30 years ago: social security and medicare are going to crash.
  • The people who have vested interests in the American and World economy, knew and saw that this was coming. And they were at risk of loosing great amount of wealth, and great amount of power. So they figured out a very clever way that, when the system collapses, whatever is left standing, could be rebuilt, will be under their control, fully, giving them the ability to maintain their wealth and power.
  • And what is that? So, let’s look at the patents:
    • There’s an Israeli company that got a patent from the USA, Aug 31st, it’s 50 pages of complex nano- technology engineering, and it describes technology that already exists in these vaccines that possess the ability to measure internal physiological data (heart rate, temperature, and respiratory rate), and then, transmit that data to a third party, with your location. I’ll give you the patent numbers, you can review it. Maybe my interpretation is wrong, I don’t know. I think I understood it. We can discuss that, but it seems, implanted into the technology, at a nano-scale, in these vaccines, is the ability to accomplish a tracking, connecting to a matrix, or grid, to the people who are “vaccinated”.
    • There’s another patent, by Microsoft, hard to forget, WO 2020/060606, and it describes the linkage of biometric data to crypto-currency.
  • That’s interesting, because right now, how do we do commerce? Well, we have our ApplePay, or our Credit Card, I don’t remember the last time I paid a toll to another human being, I use EasyPass, so those are external sensors that allow us to do commerce or travel, but now imagine that that type of sensor becomes integrated into your body in a way that can it can be extricated. So you can scan your hand when you buy some bread.
  • But let’s look at the potentials for abuse here:
    • what if I don’t want to be tagged with a transmitting device? Well, I’ll be excluded from the ability to do finance, to do commerce. I may not be able to buy bread; maybe on the black market, but not on the financial system ... because everything is going crypto.
    • Paper money will collapse.
    • Even more nefarious, whoever is in control of the system, now has data on my internal temperament. They know my heart rate, my internal temperature, my respiratory rate. What if they don’t like what I say? That’s been known to happen. Well, they don’t have to put a bullet in my head, they could just restrict my ability to do commerce. And I can’t buy bread for my family.
  • So what this really is, and the Christian faith would know exactly what I’m talking about, this is the “mark of the beast”.
  • It’s about tagging humanity and using that ability to enslave us.
  • Just some thoughts that I’m sharing with you.
  • This has been planned, in my opinion, for decades. Because it took that long to develop the technology to make it happen.
  • I’ve provided all the sources that predict the beginning of the collapse of the financial system by 2026. I showed you the video of Klaus Schwab saying that he wants to tag everyone. I brought you the papers with the patents that I mentioned earlier, and the evidence of Dr Baric’s involvement in every stage of the development of this weapon of mass destruction, and in the development of the antidote, which was suppressed. With that, I humbly will end. I’m optimistic about the future, but it requires organised resistance, where we say that we will not participate in this plan to enslave us.

• Senator Roberts:

  • In Australia the current conservative government is about to introduce a “Digital Identity Bill”, which covers exactly what you’ve discussed. This is not fantasy stuff, this is real. The COVID is just the foreplay. The real act is the Digital ID. It brings a social credit system, digital currency, control. Exactly what you’ve said.
  • My office started researching this, and we have done a 17 page rebuttal of it. It is insidious. There is nothing fanciful about what you’re saying. It is exactly correct.
  • The end goal is a return to feudalism, under the control of major corporations. The basic elites. This is feudalism. What they want is feudalism with electronic control, as you said, plus complete currency control in the social credit system. It’s insidious to think that our government is doing that.
• Dr Zelenko:
  • Well, this is not new. Throughout history, slavery has been the most lucrative commodity. This is modern-day slavery. An attempt to enslave us in the modern day.
  • I’m a Jew, so we’ve learned about the Exodus from Egypt. It’s in our psyche. I’m very sensitive to it.
  • Whoever is increasing fear and encouraging human isolation, is the embodiment of evil. Whoever is giving hope, optimism, faith, is the opposite. This is a war against God’s consciousness. All totalitarian regimes always try to eliminate houses of worship and God’s conscioussness. Why? Because if I bow down to God, I won’t bow down to them.
  • By using fear to take our consciousness, and making people co-dependent like in a cult, governments and corrupt oligarch, sociopaths, who bow down to false gods, the false “golden calf” of this vaccine, that’s the paradigm for slavery.
• Senator Roberts: Significant parts of the wording of the “Digital ID” legislation has been copied and pasted from the World Economic Forum (WEF).
• Dr Zelenko:
  • Bill Gates in a TedTalk said that the world’s population needs to be reduced by 15% through the use of vaccines.
  • Last year, the same sociopath said 7 billion people must be vaccinated.
  • I leave you with this question: Why would I take a vaccine from someone who wants to reduce the world’s population?

Dr Zelenko Exposes the Cabal

Dr Zev Zelenko drops the ultimate "Red Pill": (Jan 27th 2022) [405]

• I am a conspiracy realist.
• BlackRock and Vanguard are stakeholders in industry, academia and politics.
• BlackRock and Vanguard invest in each other in something called "circular ownership".
• Thus, consider Vanguard and BlackRock as a monopoly that owns everything.
• With due diligence, you will discover that the major stakeholders of this monopoly are:
  • The Rosthschild family
  • The Dupont family
  • The Rockefeller family
  • The Carnegie family
  • The Orsini family
  • The American Bush family, and,
  • The British Royal family
• They use the following foundations to foment chaos around the world:
  • Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
  • Soros Open Society Foundation
  • Clinton foundation
• These foundations are instrumental for geo-political destabilisation.
• Chaos is good for business and power acquisition.
• Only a divinely inspired force can overcome this Goliath.
• The world will be redeemed by acts of goodness and kindness.
• We need collective divine consciousness in order to merit divine intervention.
• The owners of the BlackRock-Vanguard monopoly are a manifestation of the primordial serpent (the Devil).
• I'm very optimistic of an upcoming redemptive event that will rebalance our dark world.
• Fasten your seat bealts and enjoy the ride.